Solid-rock facts that prove Dylan’s innocence as his ‘temple’ faces incendiary claims
Bob, we believe in you, no matter what ‘JC’ says she remembers in the Chelsea Hotel…
The world of Bob Dylan fans, experts and pundits has gone up in flames after he was accused of sexually abusing a girl aged 12 in 1965.
A lawsuit has been filed.
If the claims are real then Bob needs to face the music…but if they are proved to be wrong, as so many of us stoically believe, then J.C. – the only identification being given to his accuser – should be taken to task.
It is claimed that Bob, aged 80, allegedly groomed, sexually abused and threatened physical violence against J.C.
Both MSM and social media are gathering at Bob’s ‘cabin door’ to dispute the claims – and experts say it is virtually impossible for him to have been in the Chelsea Hotel in New York due to his touring schedule.
This is supported by Dylan experts who say the time and place of the allegations don’t fit in with Dylan’s touring commitments.
The claims in the suit say the assaults happened in April and May. But Dylan was overseas for the majority of May, playing almost a dozen dates in England detailed in setlists.
He was also all over on the West Coast in April, playing in Berkeley, California. (April 3); Vancouver, British Columbia (April 9); Portland, Ore. (April 23); and Seattle (April 30).
Swedish researcher Olof Bjorner, who documents Dylan’s live performances and recording sessions has highlighted these events.
Then on April 25, Dylan went from Seattle to the UK to begin his Don’t Look Back tour, Rolling Stone magazine says. Upon arrival in England, he gave a press conference at the airport, which documentary filmmaker D.A. Pennebaker seen in his 1967 film Don’t Look Back.
The tour ran from April 30 to May 10, then he flew to Portugal with Sara, says Dylan scholar, Prof Anne Margaret Daniel. Dylan then returned to London on May 23 where he actually went in to hospital for a number of days.
The alleged abuse occurred multiple times over a six-week period between April and May 1965.
When did he have time?
Clinton Heylin, well-known Dylan writer, has said that Dylan spent most of his time in Woodstock when not touring. And if he was in New York City, he stayed at his manager’s apartment in Gramercy. “It is almost impossible to find one week — let alone six — that spring when Dylan could have been staying at the Chelsea Hotel,” Heylin told Rolling Stone magazine.
The legal documents,seen by USA TODAY also claim that Dylan “exploited his status as a musician” to illegally provide drugs and alcohol to the underage girl.
A spokesperson for Dylan said that “the 56-year-old claim is untrue and will be vigorously defended”.
All of us, I’m sure, agree that the claims must be causing one of the greatest artists of this and the last century much heartache and upset.
But us true fans must not allow him to dwell in the shadow kingdom of litigation and fear … if he committed the crime, he will be punished.
If he didn’t then he will almost certainly be cleared. But in this awful internet world, cyber mud sticks.
We at Our Society will monitor the case closely and we will also continue to play Dylan’s brilliant catalogue and revere him for the genius who is generally seen as.
But too it is a sign of the times when celebrities are sued – or accused – of some kind of impropriety which could ring the bells in a career ending holocaust.
It’s not the first time Bob has faced hurtful and shock claims … in 2013 Croatians filed a lawsuit against him for “incitement to hatred”.
French officials notified Dylan of the lawsuit when his “Never Ending Tour” brought him to Paris for three concerts at the Grand Rex, and to receive the Legion of Honour.
The suit was filed last year by the Representative Council of the Croatian Community and Institutions in France (CRICCF).
It was based on a quote in Dylan’s interview with Rolling Stone magazine.
Referring to the legacy of the American civil war, Dylan said: “This country is just too f**ked up about colour . . . Blacks know that some whites didn’t want to give up slavery – that if they had their way, they would still be under the yoke, and they can’t pretend they don’t know that. If you got a slave master or Klan in your blood, blacks can sense that. That stuff lingers to this day. Just like Jews can sense Nazi blood and the Serbs can sense Croatian blood.”
The allegations never amounted to anything.
Then Levy’s widow, Claudia Levy, filed the lawsuit back in January after Dylan sold his publishing catalogue to Universal Music Publishing Group in December, arguing that the estate should receive a portion of the overall amount that Dylan took home from the reported $300million sale.
Dylan and UMG’s lawyers contended that the original agreement drafted between Dylan and Levy in 1975 made it clear that he would not own any of the material, and that his profit participation would consist of a share of songwriting royalties, which Judge Barry Ostrager of the Supreme Court of New York agreed with.
In another extraordinary accusation, Bob was accused of being racist in Hurricane, a song about Reuben Carter … Grant Avery claimed that the 43 year old ‘outlaw’ song had racist content. It floundered on the desk of a local radio station.
#templeinflames #bobdylan #jc #courts #rollingstone #hurricane #webelieveinyoubob #levy
10 Replies to “Solid-rock facts that prove Dylan’s innocence as his ‘temple’ faces incendiary claims”
who subbed this?? in one paragraph you say he played Seattle on April 30, in the next you say he flew from Seattle to UK on April 25. And between April 9 and 23? Relax – I happen to know he was in California, having discussions with Sara, soon to become Mrs Dylan. Nine months later, Jesse Dylan was born.
Peter Bacon subbed it! hahahah!
cheers
Leigh
In other words, the aforementioned allegation is a bag of shite, m’lud. Furthermore, j’accuse JC of being none other than James, Catherine, infamous teenie groupie of the Sixties who for years has claimed to have bedded every big name in pop from Dylan, to all The Beatles, to Val Doonican, to David Bowie, to Cliff Richard. Actually, scratch that last one, I might be thinking of Keef. Anyways, Google her and then consign her to the trash.
What do you think Dennis? Did he do it? good comment tho! I’ll have a word with the sub!
he wasn’t “was overseas for the majority of May” he was FOR THE WHOLE OF MAY! Bob came back on June 3rd, having landed in UK on April 25th, so it’s the WHOLE OF MAY!
Vilma Esther Speelman
Bob isn’t that kind of person, especially with kids. He does love the ladies but he always has. I don’t believe any of it!
Belinda Hendrix
There is a lady who absolutely broke his timeline down in a comment. 65 was a very busy year for him. He toured with Joan and went to Europe plus the Newport Festival on top of that got married. I don’t believe it and I hope she drops the suit.
Mara Karetsos
Bob Dylan: Grand Home du Cœur
From the Greek Fans 🇬🇷🎼🎹
This lying moneygrabbing dame could not have chosen a worse time frame, April/May ’65, in which to place her invention. Now some say she might be ‘confused’ in her recollection of dates. So maybe she’ll opt for ’64? Dylan had Joan Baez permanently attached to his side that year. Or maybe ’66? He was touring once more, until his motorcycle accident when he retreated with his new family to Woodstock. There is only one period on record, when Dylan was in residence at the Chelsea Hotel. That was autumn ’65. He was indeed occupying a suite, either 211 or 210 – shared with a heavily pregnant Sara, soon after they married. He also had a piano installed. As he recalled a decade later….’Staying up for days in the Chelsea Hotel/ Writing Sad Eyed Lady Of The Lowlands for you…’
This complaint is written to create as much tumult as possible. In fact, it just screams “You want me to go away!” But is it specious? I guess time will tell…