Court in the act … the liars and beasts of family law
The Society contributor, musician and writer Andrew Brel, takes a short, sharp look at those who think they can pass judgement on our lives …
British family law is a racket whose purpose is not to represent the best interest of children.
It’s purpose is to reward the members of family law and in that it is enormously successful.
By CAFCASS calculation (detailed in my book WHO LIES WINS) 100% of cases disputed in family court include parental alienation and child abuse.
That number in actuality represents around 100,000 people in the UK – children, parents and grandparents – whose lives are blighted, often beyond repair, annually.
Judges in family court hearing lie as a matter of course knowing they are protected by Section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act, a ridiculous antiquated legal nonsense that provides qualified immunity for family court judges to make unappealable judgments.
Until this law is removed – and judges are required to meet the same bar of competency as in any other branch of law, that is the transparency of an appeal process to prevent liars from lying in awareness that their lies will be kept secret. Why then would they not lie for the rewards this represents when family law provides what is literally a get out of jail free card for any lying judge.
#jusges #familycourts #dadsmums #children #parentalalienaiton #familylaw